Why cbrn training is important

Its highly realistic nature provides trainees with in-depth knowledge and experience, and readies them for LAT - the peak of CBRN training. Simulation training is safe and flexible, allowing students to participate in a variety of scenarios - ranging, for example, from a chemical attack on a battlefield, to a biological attack on a subway.

Finally, the ability to review the use of the simulators post-training ensures that students receive the best possible teaching and can progress, with full confidence in their abilities.

So, what are some of the key benefits of using simulators for CBRN training? Creates realistic training scenarios Simulation training is highly realistic. Enables safe and varied training scenarios As real CBRN agents are not being used, there are no environmental issues or health and safety matters to take into consideration during simulation training.

Allows for post-training analysis The main challenge inherent in simulation training is ensuring that the hazard environment is accurately portrayed, so that no false lessons are learned.

Written by Steven Pike. Subscribe to Email Updates. Click subscribe to consent to instant blog updates. Recent Popular Categories. Recent Posts. Other Links. Incorporating the use of simulator detector equipment in military CBRN training provides instructors with a flexible, scaleable and safe training solution. In addition there is now also the option to take realistic CBRN instruction to a new level through the use of software that interacts directly with actual operational detector equipment.

With the use of the new Radiation Field Training Simulator RaFTS for example, instructors can extend CBRN training capability beyond the realm of radiological training to encompass a wider variety of hazardous substances, complex virtual scenarios and multiple instrument types. The security environment in which CBRN responders are required to operate is in a state of continuing evolution - fueled in no small part by the growth of international free trade, increased cross-border movement, globalization, fundamentalism and the information-sharing capabilities of the internet.

In this challenging and ever-changing CBRN environment, a commitment to hands-on, realistic training has a vital role to play in ensuring a common knowledge base, a minimum level of best practice and the highest possible standard of operational readiness. Topics: Chemical Hazard Training. In he was appointed as Argon Electronics' North American business development manager.

Combat operations in a CBRN environment As commander of a Special Forces detachment in the s, Collins routinely conducted close-quarters battle training with live ammunition while wearing protective masks and, on occasion, with full protective equipment. Subscribe to Email Updates. Click subscribe to consent to instant blog updates.

One of the more challenging scenarios to simulate is that of a CBRN hazard release, because in the majority of cases the real event creates sensory rather than visual effects and therefore the simulation has to be able to replicate the sensory perception through a visual effect.

Where CBRN simulation realism is concerned the main driver is to be able to replicate the ability to detect and monitor a near invisible or invisible hazard as it moves through the air or contaminates equipment, infrastructure or terrain.

This led in the first instance to using wet simulants as interferant's against operational CBRN detectors and monitors. However, this proved ineffectual as the majority of wet simulants can only be used outside, are difficult to dispense and control in open air, and trainees can see the instructors releasing the substances making for an unrealistic training setting.

Furthermore, this method meant that instructors could not guarantee replication of a particular CBRN scenario due to the unreliability of the wind, temperature and humidity and correct use of the detection devices.

Therefore gauging skill competence in the use of operational detectors and monitors across multiple groups of trainees was impossible, not to mention the wear and possible damage to operational equipment and environmental damage through saturation of training areas; or the difficulty creating indoor scenarios with chemical simulants.

This training capability gap was recognised by UK company Argon Electronics who have spent over 23 years developing and producing realistic CBRN simulators to become a recognised world leader in this technology.

Their approach accurately replicates how detection and monitoring devices react when confronted by a range of CBRN agents, taking into account the volatility of the agents, the prevailing meteorological conditions and the tactics and techniques used to detect differing agents. Additionally, the simulators have an in built after action review AAR facility allowing interrogation of the simulator after use.

Exploitation and Expansion of the Simulation Technology.